An ABC news article posted by Tim Robinson on 5th Feb asks this very same question and gives what I think to be an interesting point of view. Are the rats taking over the lab? Are we trying to save the economy at the expense of the environment? Is it time to think differently?
My analysis of the situation, which is open to debate is outlined very simply below:
The Global Financial Crisis has been bought on by the a combination of greed and, blind trust and misplaced optimism.
Global financial markets seem to have been built on a sort of pyramid gambling scheme. When the only tangible layer collapsed the rest soon followed.
The Result - A downward spiral that is not being fed by negative media (we are not talking ourselves into this recession (or depression)) but that is gathering pace due to the fact that we have finally woken up to the fact that the emperor is wearing NOTHING!
So, what next for the environment?
Well the current market re-leveling may not please the financial, political or any sector. We will all suffer financially if things don’t turn around. However, the downturn is doing something positive for the environment. As demand for commodities falls there is no need to mine more. People are buying less so we don’t need to make so much. People are turning more to public transport and are buying less cars. Holidays are being taken closer to home.
All in all, as our demand receeds the environment is given some breathing space.
This is not all good news though. Recession hits not just the companies who pollute. It also affects “Green” businesses, many of which are still young and vulnerable. The venture capital market hides their wallets and shies away from new investment and families who want to invest in green tech can no longer get funded (or afford to save for) the infrastructure. Existing cars are kept for longer, inefficient appliances are made to chug on for a bit longer and groceries are bought because they are cheap rather than organic. Governments move towards a more protectionist policy and look to “sure up” existing manufacturing even if it is polluting and ineficcient. We all get hit by the “short term thinking” stick.
Which way to turn?
It is difficult to see what is going to stop the rot. Governments around the globe are applying the Keynesian approach to economics by throwing cash at us to get us spending. While this may tide countries like Australia over in the short term there is little doubt that spending can’t go on forever and our fate is very much tied to global outcomes.
While it is great to be handed cash on the one hand, on the other we are all going to pay for this generosity for years to come. Also this only sticks a band aid on the affect of the GFC, it does nothing to address the cause – the human condition! Our love of speculation and gambling…..
The Environment – Little Steps?
My personal hope is that families all around the globe will use this enforced prudence to re-assess their lifestyles. Little steps in each and every household will do much to address climate change.
The Environment – Giant Leap?
Well, as I have stated I believe that the GFC can be attributed to our love of a good gamble. I doubt that the world financial market is up for a re-design that includes more regulation and less ability to gamble and package up the gambling to sugar coat it. Therefore I believe that we should separate the “Real” economy from the “financial” economy when talking about the environment.
The real economy will hopefully be driven from the ground up by individual families stimulating the need for greener and more sustainable products and services. We should consider investing our stimulus package in sustainable products and services.
The financial economy will, in my mind always suffer these “corrections” as the market is by its very nature speculative. We can only hope that when the market decides to go on another gambling spree they put their money into a “Green” pot so that some good can come out of it all. For that to happen we all need to make it look as attractive as possible and then get ready to launch our parachutes for the next crash landing.
So, is the GFC good for the environment? I think that the answer to that question lies with us, the consumer.







